Search for: "Morrison v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The decision is one of first impression in the Second Circuit with respect to two questions arising out of the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:00 am by Paul Caron
Brohl (10th Circuit) (Joseph Bankman (Stanford), Jordan Barry (San Diego), Barbara Fried (Stanford), Alan Morrison (George Washington), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), Kirk Stark (UCLA), John Swain (Arizona) & Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis)): This case, Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:50 am by Paul Caron
Brohl (Joseph Bankman (Stanford), Jordan Barry (San Diego), Barbara Fried (Stanford), David Gamage (UC-Berkeley), Andrew Haile (Elon), Alan Morrison (George Washington), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), Kirk Stark (UCLA), John Swain (Arizona) & Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis)): The... [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
In October 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an important decision concerning the extraterritorial application of the U.S. securities laws, Morrison v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The three day appeal in the “data leak” case of Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarkets will begin on 9 October 2018. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:47 am by Paralegal Mentor
Boone is a legal assistant with Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP in Nashville, Tennessee. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:47 am by Paralegal Mentor
Boone is a legal assistant with Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP in Nashville, Tennessee. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
Among the significant opinions he authored was United States v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 7:00 pm by Michael C. Smith
I had an interesting moment in a recent trial in Judge Leonard Davis' court in February when I realized that my cocounsel George Chandler, Judge Davis and I all had the same property professor at Baylor Law School - former Dean Angus McSwain. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Brian Shiffrin
We must therefore determine whether the statements were "testimonial," because only testimonial statements are subject to the Confrontation Clause (see Davis v Washington, 547 US 813, 821).In Brown (13 NY3d at 336), the report in question contained machine-generated raw data, graphs and charts of a male specimen's DNA characteristics that were isolated from a rape kit. [read post]